Penny Tray wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 10:47 amPenny Tray wrote: ↑Thu Jan 24, 2019 8:50 amPenny Tray wrote: ↑Fri Jan 18, 2019 7:37 am
GLASGOW HERALD
18 JANUARY 1895
Sir,
THE ARDROSSAN LIFEBOAT
As an eye-witness of the rescue, will you allow me to state, what seems to be the general opinion of the district, that at the time of the rescue and for at least four hours previous thereto the wind pressure at no point exceeded 40 miles an hour.
As regards “sea,” during the whole trip the hull of the rescuing boat was never out of range of vision. The wind was bitter, and there was a short, choppy sea – heaviest just outside the harbour entrance; but there the small boat remained in full view. It is not an uncommon spectacle to see during the stormy weather often prevalent in September the salmon fishermen going from Saltcoats to their nets, anchored at the inches, in a 16 foot open skiff with close-reefed lugsail, and through a sea in the trough of which the small craft, sail and all, is lost to view some seconds between every wave. Compared with this the “sea” between the wreck and Ardrossan Harbour after the wind veered to the north-west was practically nil.
Mr. Thomas Nibbs, coastguardsman, whose skill and experience in lifeboat work is probably greater than that of all the Ardrossan lifeboat crew put together, stated at the inquiry that at the time the lifeboat gave up he considered she could have been rowed-out if double-banked, and no amount of cross-questioning shook this skilled opinion, which in the estimation of the judicious must outweigh a host of Ardrossan Harbour officials.
Further, if the tug had been got out she could have effected the rescue alone, and probably much quicker than if hampered by an indifferently manned lifeboat.
Captain Shields and Mr. John Craig say neither of them has any charge or responsibility in connection with the lifeboat. Why did they send for, consult with, and instruct the coxswain if that official was alone responsible?
I am &c.,
WINTON PIER
GLASGOW HERALD
18 JANUARY 1895
Sir,
THE ARDROSSAN LIFEBOAT
Although I have not the honour of knowing Mr. George B. Main, I rest assured that he is quite capable of replying to any letter which has yet appeared in your columns relative to this deplorable incident, and am glad to see from your issue of yesterday (16 January 1895) that he “bides his time.”
I would prefer not to form a third party to this correspondence; but surely this is a case when Mr. Main (a stranger to the locality) should have the assistance of junior counsel as it were, to work up the facts. To this end I would, with your permission, call upon the assistant secretary to the Ardrossan Lifeboat Committee, to give a full and complete list of those gentlemen who formed the committee, say on Friday 21st December last, and what changes, with the dates thereof, have been made down to this date.
I am &c.,
TERTIUM QUID
GLASGOW HERALD
24 JANUARY 1895
Sir,
THE ARDROSSAN LIFEBOAT
I have read with much interest the correspondence on the above subject.
It is not my intention to go into the details of the recent public inquiry- as it was called – further than to say that it would take a more searching inquiry to satisfy the people in the locality and district, who sympathise very strongly with your correspondent, Mr. Main.
There was one point in Captain Graham’s recommendation that I thought very appropriate – viz., that there should be frequent drill or exercise in moderately rough weather.
Some have thought that the failure of the lifeboat crew to reach the wreck and do what the gallant fishermen did so nobly in a small boat was due to want of courage. Others have expressed the opinion that it was to want of ability to manage the boat. It is on this point of the subject, taken in connection with the above recommendation, that I crave your indulgence for a few lines.
It will be in the recollection of your readers in this district that on a day in the summer some three years ago – if I mistake not – a fine day, with just a pleasant breeze blowing, the crew of the lifeboat went out for practice. From some cause, best known to themselves, they got ashore opposite the old rope work, 1½ miles or so from their starting point, and instead of exercising themselves and displaying their ability to manage their craft by taking her home they took her a little farther along the shore, and sent to Ardrossan for the carriage, and had her taken home through Saltcoats by horse power instead of in her element.
The remark was freely made at the time that if that was all they could do with the lifeboat in such weather they would be very helpless to assist the ship-wrecked in a storm.
After witnessing the above (to me) sad display I was not surprised to hear what took place on the memorable 22nd December, 1894.
I am &c.,
P.M.
GLASGOW HERALD
25 JANUARY 1895
Sir,
THE ARDROSSAN LIFEBOAT
By your kindness this whole matter has now been fully discussed pro and con, and your readers have doubtless already pretty well made up their minds as to whether or not the Ardrossan lifeboat acted in a capable manner on the occasion of the recent shipwreck at that port.
The purpose of those who think with me has now been sufficiently answered for the moment, as I understand from a sympathetic letter which I have received from a well-known Member of Parliament the whole matter is likely to be brought under the notice of Parliament in the course of the ensuing session.
On a very recent date Glasgow gave largely to the funds of the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, and the public have a right to demand that the present case should not be allowed to pass without an independent public inquiry.
I am &c.,
GEORGE B. MAIN,
2 Dalzell Drive,
Pollokshields,
Glasgow.
GLASGOW HERALD
30 JANUARY 1895
Sir,
THE ARDROSSAN LIFEBOAT
After the correspondence which has taken place regarding above, I dare say many of your readers are wondering if nothing is being done to recognise the bravery of the Saltcoats fishermen, who went out in an ordinary ship’s boat and rescued the three survivors of the crew of the LOVEN, while the crew of the best lifeboat on the West of Scotland remained helpless in the harbour watching how it was done.
For the information of your readers, I may say that while the Provosts and Magistrates of Ardrossan and Saltcoats respectively have not thought it worthwhile to open a subscription list (as was done in Irvine for the lifeboat crew there) it has not been overlooked.
Mr. Guthrie, Ardrossan & Saltcoats Herald Office, Ardrossan, has offered to receive subscriptions, and has already received upwards of £48. There are probably many others who would like to do something to acknowledge the services of these gallant fishermen, who, without the lifeboat, exhibited a bravery not less notable than that of the Irvine lifeboat crew.
I am &c.,
AYRSHIRE